The Blame Game

Does responsibility always rest with those at the top of the tree? For Crows and Demons fans apparently it does. Two Coaches in two weeks and whispering of more to come, but is the sacking of AFL’s senior coaches the best medicine?

2011 is bound to go down in the record books for the Adelaide Crows, for all the wrong reasons. The crows have only managed 5 wins out of 17 games this season, their lowest total in the clubs 21 year history. Two of the losses they have had in 2011 have to the hands of Melbourne and St Kilda were not only record defeats but the loss to St Kilda was the lowest score kicked in any game for the Crows (3.6.24).

Melbourne on the other hand were promising developments from season 2011, they have won 7 ½ games so far this season, have looked promising when they win, on the flip side the Demons have an average losing margin of 70 points. Undoubtedly frustrating for Melbourne fans their side unable to be competitive most weeks of the season. Tensions reached breaking point on the weekend with the side succumbing to the 2nd largest loss in VFL/AFL history.

Following both of those losses the clubs respective coaches now find themselves on the outside looking in. Neil Craig came out on the Monday following the Crows loss to St Kilda stating he would step down immediately feeling he wasn’t the right person for the job. And just this week Dean Bailey received a call from Melbourne president Jim Stynes on  Sunday afternoon informing him that he would no longer be coach of the Demons, in the press conference on Monday Bailey stated that the loss on Saturday was the straw that broke the camel’s back.

Is it really necessary to sack the man at the top? Football clubs are made up of a full coaching panel, a whole list of players, support staff and a board who are all at some point in the season and at some level responsible for their clubs success. Melbourne came out on Monday singing praises of how smooth the club was travelling yet had to get rid of the senior coach after the worst performance in the clubs history.

Surely someone else at the clubs has some sort of liability in that sort of environment. The 22 players that take to the field each week seem not to have the motivation to fight out 4 quarters and play for their coach. The players shoulder the burden in this instance, they are the men that go out and fight the battles week after week. Coaching panels have become increasingly popular with clubs over recent years with every single AFL club sporting a panel of around 6-10 coaches. It is unbelievable that  the senior coach can take all the blame when this panel of coaches spends hours assessing the defensive or offensive capabilities, talking to players and genuinely have the same amount of time with players and have a relative level of input into game structures. Coaches will continue to be stood down after poor performances, players and assistant coaches will continue to fly under the radar when sides under perform. Two coaches down this season with a couple in the firing line in the last 6 weeks of the season. Expectation can be a senior coaches downfall year in year out.

Maybe it’s easier to get rid of one coach then a whole coaching panel, board and playing list…



10 responses to “The Blame Game

  1. Yes bailey crap coach over the past three years experience coach to snap those players into shape!

  2. Nick Macdonald

    how do you judge Bailey as being a crap coach? First 2 years the club was tanking, last year won 7 games, this year on track to win 10 and a half… on track?

  3. An average of 26 percent winning average that say s that too me how about knights he won more made finals in his first year them got chopped!

  4. Nick Macdonald

    well of course his average would be low, they cut half the list, tanked for the first two seasons. I would say Melbourne are exactly where they would expect to be in the plan after getting the picks in 2008 & 2009. I actually think Bailey could coach and lay more blame on senior players at Melbourne, leadership group almost non existant.

  5. As a coach and club you cant ignore a 186 loss if he cant get full intensity of the players he aint your coach cats did as they pleased! I think melb did not pick too well in the draft any way watt s a dud

  6. In 2006 the cats lost to the pies by 95 points an lost 3 or 4 other games by 60+…. won the premiership the next year. Knee jerk decision by a board that set him up for failure! If he was coaching for his job and the now then McDonald and bruce would be there still! Performed a selfless task at a club that seems to have selfish leaders.

  7. Nick Macdonald

    if you didn’t notice, I am a Melbourne supporter and very annoyed they didn’t at least let him coach the year out

  8. I like melb too its heart braking seeing the oldest club struggling and when has players ever been sacked over big losses?

  9. Nick Macdonald

    didn’t suggest sacking them, just lay blame on the leadership group.

  10. I dont think there is much they can do with more blame! I think they need to create a positive culture!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s